Off the wire
1st Ld-Writethru: China to accelerate developing nuclear power: Official  • 1st LD Writethru: Five killed in Boko Haram attack in southeast Niger  • Chinese national table tennis team starts military training for 2016 Olympics  • Saudi Arabia commute Sri Lankan housemaid's stone death sentence: minister  • 1 soldier killed, 6 injured in explosion in SE Turkey  • Philippine poll body bars female senator to run for president  • Man detained on suspicion of involving terrorism  • Iran says U.S. visa waiver restrictions may endanger JCPOA implementation  • Britain hails best ever year for film makers  • Iraqi PM lays wreath at Monument to the People's Heroes  
You are here:   Home

China slams U.S. double standards on terrorism

Xinhua, December 23, 2015 Adjust font size:

China on Wednesday rejected U.S. criticism against its draft law on terrorism and urged Washington to refrain from applying "double standards" in fighting terrorism.

"We hope the United States will stop groundless accusations and respect China's law-making processes," Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Hong Lei told a regular press briefing.

He was responding to a question regarding a statement by the U.S. State Department expressing concern over the draft.

Increasing terrorist attacks have posed serious threats to China's national security and the life and property of its people, China's legislation on terrorism is completely necessary to prevent and crack down on terrorism, Hong said.

He stressed that fighting terrorism itself is part of the efforts to protect human rights, and that the Chinese government attaches importance to striking a balance between anti-terrorism measures and protection of human rights.

The spokesman pointed out that as Internet is frequently used by terrorists in planning and conducting attacks, countries including the United States enacted laws obligating Internet operators and service providers to providing assistance to law enforcement agencies.

Similar items in China's draft anti-terrorism law is completely reasonable and will not constitute a breach of corporate intellectual property rights or citizens' freedom of speech, Hong said. Endi