The Globalization Pace of Confucius Institutes
China Today by Li Jie, April 26, 2017 Adjust font size:
Firm Steps Override Doubts
As dean of her Institute, public relations are integral to Wang’s work. Although full of trepidations when she first arrived, after gradually finding her way Wang has won recognition and praise from local participants. “Their take on the actual situation is what really counts,” she said.
When Confucius Institutes were first established, fears were sometimes voiced based on the so-called “China threat” theory. Over the past three years, Confucius Institutes at the University of Chicago, University of Pennsylvania, and Stockholm University have successively shut down. The international community has become a breeding ground for rumors and controversy about Confucius Institutes in this regard.
Wang wholeheartedly rebuts such rhetoric. In fact, the procedure for establishing a Confucius Institute requires a foreign university or relevant educational institution to first apply to the Confucius Institute headquarters. Upon receiving approval, the local and Chinese parties jointly run the institute. The Chinese dean is responsible for Confucius Institutes under their governing Council, and both Chinese and foreign deans are jointly in charge of the Institute’s daily operations and management.
It is generally the foreign dean who raises demands, and the Chinese contingent that offers cooperation and support. Take academic activities as an example. The two parties jointly decide on activities and invite researchers specializing in topics relating to China or East Asia to present their views and hold academic debates. Teachers of Chinese language and culture classes – fundamental courses at Confucius Institutes – do their utmost to teach students the most effective learning methods, and to present a multidimensional image of Chinese society.
“The so-called ‘China threat’ theory is a false proposition,” Li said. Nobody takes it into consideration in their actual work. As teachers and volunteers assigned from China, Wang and Li must do their best to accomplish their teaching plan and at the same time hold various cultural activities. As they are apart from their families, they devote all their time to their work at the Institute, yet still feel there are not enough hours in the day. “These rumors themselves perhaps reflect the general misapprehensions about China,” Li said.
“Confucius Institutes are a bridge to the Chinese language and culture, as well as providers of learning resources.” Li believes that Institutes enact an irreplaceable role, because they offer face-to-face, experiential learning. Interaction between workers at Confucius Institutes and people in local communities evokes a tangible, touchable China.
After reading a newspaper article arbitrarily attacking Confucius Institutes, Wang’s Finnish colleague showed it to her and angrily refuted its content. Wang just laughed it off, remarking that all we can do is to mind our own business, as people who understand us know what we have really done.
Next Crossroad
“Confucius Institutes have now reached a crossroad. We must seriously consider how they are going to develop and what kind of path we should take.” This was the comment Xu made on the development of Confucius Institutes after a review of the past decade.
According to the Confucius Institutes development plan, their global layout will be basically completed by 2020. This will entail unifying quality standards, test certifications, and the appointment and training of teachers; realizing multilingualism and broad coverage of international Chinese language textbooks; establishing a wide-ranging global Chinese language and culture communication system with comprehensive functions, and making Chinese one of the languages learned and spoken widely throughout the world.
Teaching staff are integral to the future development of Confucius Institutes. At present, these teachers are mainly professionals and volunteers assigned from China. All, including Chinese deans, sign contracts valid for one to four years. Most return to their original posts in China when they finish their overseas assignments. Then groups of newly-selected teachers go to Confucius Institutes around the world.
During her two-year posting at the Confucius Institute, Wang has witnessed two shifts of volunteers and many other staff rotations. “This actually increases the difficulties in our work,” she said. Every group of workers needs training in order to be familiar with the work right from the start. Li has returned to China after finishing her one-year voluntary work, and felt reluctant to say goodbye when the time came to leave. “Just as I started to feel attuned to the work there, I had to leave. I knew and had achieved a rapport with all my students. But a new teacher needs to start from the very beginning while carrying on with the teaching plan. This is a challenge for both teacher and students,” she said.
Localization of teachers has been frequently mentioned over the past two years in connection with the development of Confucius Institutes. However, taking Finland as an example, no more than 10 Finnish teachers hold local Chinese teaching certification. Localization is hence a long-term, complicated project. “At the moment at least, it’s a difficult proposition,” Wang said. Guaranteeing the quality of assigned teaching staff, therefore, seems a particularly important task.
Wang has lately been pondering another matter. She hopes to provide educational and consulting courses for local enterprises in Finland, so forging more links between the Confucius Institute and the local community. This will, at the same time, make more funds available, something that is also relevant to the future sustainable development of Confucius Institutes.
LI JIE is a reporter with People’s Daily Overseas Edition.