Off the wire
Quotable Quotes on South China Sea arbitration: China's stance against arbitration is reasonable, legitimate  • Roundup: Rift within Taliban further widens as infighting claims 20 lives in W. Afghanistan  • 1st LD-Writethru: Chinese stocks rally over Fed caution  • Chinese tourists to bring 200-bln-dollar revenue to "Belt and Road" countries  • Dubai, Abu Dhabi among world's most expensive places for expats: survey  • Clashes between militia, UN peacekeepers leave 17 dead in Central African Republic  • Burkina Faso to set up new electoral commission  • Roundup: Violence continues unabated in Pretoria  • Top news items in major Nigerian media outlets  • Top news items in major S. African media outlets  
You are here:   Home

Disney sues Chinese companies over copyright infringement

Xinhua, June 22, 2016 Adjust font size:

Two Disney subsidiaries have sued three Chinese companies for infringement of intellectual property rights and unfair competition.

Disney Enterprises Inc. and Pixar, holders of the copyrights of animated comedies "Cars" and "Cars 2" as well as the character images, sued G-Point in Beijing, PPTV in Shanghai and Bluemtv in Xiamen of east China's Fujian Province, after they found images and posters of the animated movie "The Autobots" resembling those of "Cars" and "Cars 2".

"The Autobots," screened last July, was produced by Bluemtv, released by G-Point and shown on the website of PPTV.

The case was heard in Shanghai Pudong New District People's Court on Tuesday.

At the court, attorneys for the plaintiffs said that images of the main characters in "The Autobots" -- "K1" and "K2" -- plagiarized the characters "Lightening McQueen" and "Francesco Bernoulli" in "Cars" and "Cars 2".

They also said the Chinese name of the movie bore a high resemblance to the Disney and Pixar movies.

The plaintiffs asked for immediate stop to the infringement, and compensation of 4 million yuan (607,000 U.S. dollars) to cover the economic losses and the lawsuit expense.

Lawyers for the defendants replied that images of "K1" and "K2" were created independently, based on the appearance of real automobiles. They also argued they had emphasized that "The Autobots" was a domestic movie, so consumers would not be confused by the name. In addition, the film was not successful and filmmakers did not profit.

A verdict of the case will be announced later. Endi