Off the wire
• Galca in positive mood after taking over at Espanyol  • 1st LD-Writethru: China proposes six platforms for SCO cooperation  • China suspends price adjustment for gasoline, diesel  • Baghdad renews demand of Turkish troops' pull-out from northern Iraq  • Feature: Home of Lawrence of Arabia protected for future generations  • Beijing launches Organizing Committee for 2022 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games  • China mulls credit-based restrictions on environmental violators  • British inflation rate rises to 0.1 pct in Nov.  • 51 Syrian refugees to arrive in Northern Ireland  • Petitions for postal votes rise ahead of Spanish elections  
You are here: 　 Home

1st Ld-Writethru: Corruption behind accidents deserve harsher penalties: authority

Xinhua, December 15, 2015 Adjust font size:

Corruption that leads to accidents should be subject to harsher penalties, according to a new judicial interpretation on endangering production safety.

The judicial interpretation, released Tuesday by the Supreme People's Court (SPC) and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, specified criteria for conviction and scenarios where harsher or lighter punishments should apply.

If state employees illegally invest in or hold stocks in enterprises which endanger production safety, or if corruption or bribe-taking are found directly linked with safety accidents, they should be given harsh penalties, it said.h They may also be subject to punishment for embezzlement or taking bribes, according to specific convictions.

Many devastating accidents have been related to official corruption or dereliction of duty, said the SPC's Shen Liang. Therefore, apart from punishing those directly responsible for accidents, judicial organs should give no less harsh punishments to any corrupt offenders involved.

Other cases where harsher penalties may apply include operation without viable safety permits or evading or blocking safety inspections, the interpretation said.

It also clarified the criteria for conviction and punishment for the first time, saying any accident involving one death or three severe injuries and above, or a direct economic loss worth 1 million yuan (154,799 U.S. dollars) and above, can be regarded as crime of endangering production safety. Moreover, the judicial interpretation "hidden stock holders," often state employees or enterprise managers who hold stock in other people's names, will also be held accountable.

People who are responsible for accidents can be convicted of intentional homicide or intentional injury, if they obstruct rescue efforts, hide or abandon victims.

The SPC explained the background for the interpretation, saying production still faces safety challenges with accidents resulting in many deaths and injuries. An explosion in chemical warehouse in Tianjin on Aug. 12 caused heavy casualties, destruction of houses, huge economic losses and grave social impact.

According to official statistics, from 2012 to 2014, courts at all levels tried 5,707 cases of endangering production safety. Endi