Off the wire
China treasury bond futures close higher Wednesday  • China Hushen 300 index futures close lower Wednesday  • Chinese shares close lower Wednesday  • S. Korea's component exports post double-digit growth in Q1  • Indian Supreme Court orders 13 top BJP leaders to face trial in mosque demolition case  • Taking China's university innovation to market  • Raptors' Lowry bounces back against Bucks to even series 1-1  • 2nd LD: Taliban shadow governor killed in N. Afghan raid  • Australian PM warns exporters against domestic gas shortage  • Xinhua Asia-Pacific news summary at 0600 GMT, April 19  
You are here:   Home

Indian parliamentary panel proposes to put call drops under consumer laws

Xinhua, April 19, 2017 Adjust font size:

An Indian parliamentary panel has proposed that call drops be brought under the purview of the country's consumer laws to enable aggrieved users to take telecom service providers to consumer court for poor service, officials said Wednesday.

Call drops, the sudden interruption of phone calls that leaves mobile users babbling for seconds before realizing the disconnection, are very common in India.

"If the parliamentary panel's recommendations are accepted, it will be a big boost for mobile phone users. Under the existing law, cases related to call drops are monitored by Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI)," a senior official said, on condition of anonymity.

Indian Telecom Minister Manoj Sinha has said though call drops have fallen drastically in recent months, his ministry will seriously "look into the recommendations".

The reccomendations of the parliamentary panel came nearly a year after India's Supreme Court ruled that mobile users can't claim compensation from cell phone operators for call drops.

TRAI, in October 2015, ordered that customers will have to be compensated by telecom operators for call drops and that customers should get one Indian rupee per dropped call up to a maximum of three rupees a day.

The telecom operators had approached the apex court saying TRAI's order was unfair because connectivity is affected by factors beyond their control. Endit