Off the wire
European Medicines Agency calls for reducing antimicrobials use in animals  • Roundup: Eurozone economy starts 2017 with robust growth pace  • Iraqi PM declares full liberation of eastern side of Mosul  • Foreign exchange rate of Euro to other currencies  • UAE Crown Prince arrives in India on 3-day visit  • Greek independent MP joins main opposition party, ruling Left lags in surveys  • NATO deepens cooperation with partners in Gulf region  • 1st LD: Trump signs executive order to revive Keystone XL, Dakota pipelines  • Kuwait extends visit invitation to Lebanon's president  • "La La Land" ties record wining 14 Oscar nominations  
You are here:   Home

Spotlight: British gov't to put bill before Parliament within days to start exit process

Xinhua, January 25, 2017 Adjust font size:

Theresa May's government will put a bill before the British parliament within days to trigger the country's exit from the European Union, the House of Commons was told Tuesday.

The announcement to MPs (members of the Parliament) by Brexit Secretary David Davis came just hours after the highest court in Britain, the Supreme Court, ruled that the prime minister could not start the process of leaving the EU without first gaining approval from the British Parliament.

The 8-3 majority decision by the judges has been described as one of the most important constitutional rulings in British legal history.

In its decision, the judges also ruled that the government did not need to seek the approval for Brexit from the devolved parliaments in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.

Scotland's first minister Nicola Sturgeon criticized the decision, raising fears the region could pave the way for a new Scottish independence referendum if the will of the people of Scotland, who voted remain, is ignored.

SNP MPs at Westminister have warned they will put forward 50 amendments to the forthcoming "article 50" bill when it is presented to the House of Commons.

The ruling announced by Supreme Court President Lord Neuberger was hailed as a victory for democracy by wealthy Investment fund manager Gina Miller, who brought the case to the courts.

Just three hours after the decision was announced Secretary Davis made a statement to a packed House of Commons.

Sitting alongside Theresa May, Davis announced that the government will introduce a short parliamentary bill within days to trigger article 50. It will be the most straightforward bill possible, he added.

He insisted that the government will respect the will of the British people to leave the EU following the countrywide referendum last June.

Davis said the government intended to keep to May's timetable to trigger article 50 by the end of March.

"The judgement does not alter the fact that we will leave the EU," said Davis.

He made a plea to politicians at Westminster not to use the process of the new bill to frustrate or thwart the will of the British people to leave the EU.

Sir Keith Starmer, Brexit spokesman for the main opposition Labour Party, described the events as a "good day for democracy."

He said it had been wrong of May to sideline parliament by her attempt to trigger article 50 without Westminster approval.

Describing the stakes as high, he called for a detailed government paper on the Brexit process, rather than a simply worded bill.

He insisted that Labour will not frustrate the triggering of article 50. Despite that assurance a number of Labour politicians have said they will oppose the triggering of the process if the result would be a hard Brexit.

Richard Tice, co-chair of Leave Means Leave, the campaign group campaigning for a hard Brexit, accused anti-democracy campaigners of delaying the Brexit process.

"A one line bill must be tabled this week in Parliament and a clear timetable set out to ensure that Article 50 will be triggered no later than the end of March as promised by the Prime Minister. Any attempt to delay the Brexit process after backing the previous vote would be an unforgivable betrayal of the British people."

He warned that any attempts in the House of Lords to delay or crush the bill would ensure the abolition of the unelected upper chamber. Endit