Off the wire
• Major news items of leading Kenyan media outlets  • Brazil sets up new office to protect women after appalling gang rape  • Spotlight: Abenomics on ropes amid repeated delays of sales tax hike  • Philippine Navy celebrates 118th anniversary by commissioning new vessels  • Feature: Poor children dig living out of garbage piles in Cairo outskirts  • Singapore stocks close 0.02 percent lower  • Chinese "Belt and Road" Initiative will benefit Russia, expert  • Philippine President-elect Duterte draws flak for comments on media killings  • Foreign exchange rates in Singapore  • URGENT: Japan's PM announces delay in planned consumption tax hike  
You are here: 　 Home

U.S. accused of undermining WTO's justice

Xinhua, June 1, 2016 Adjust font size:

Foreign media and experts have said that the U.S. objection to the re-appointment of a sitting judge for a second term at the World Trade Organization (WTO) would undermine the organization's independence and effectiveness.

The United States last week notified other WTO member states that it will not support the re-appointment of Judge Seung Wha Chang, a South Korean, for his second four-year-term at the WTO appellate body, a standing body that hears appeals from reports issued by panels in disputes brought by WTO members.

Granting a second term for a sitting member has been common practice since the WTO was formed 20 years ago. Last year, two sitting members from the United States and India were granted second terms, according to the website of the Indian leading business and financial daily the Mint Newspaper.

The Huffington Post said Washington opposed Chang because he participated in decisions against the United States, rather than a lack of judicial competence or independence.

The Mint website reported that the venerable Korean member is accused of deviating from the covered General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade/WTO agreements in three cases.

"Linking the re-appointment of a member to specific cases could affect the trust," the six sitting members of the appellate body have said. "He has worked hard together with us to maintain the quality of our reports and to foster constructive improvement of our operations." They lauded Chang for integrity, independence and impartiality.

Gregory Shaffer, a law expert at the University of California Irvine, said the United States actively uses the WTO dispute settlement system to enforce rules on others, but that will become implausible if the United States destroys the system's credibility.

He warned that it is a high-risk strategy for an administration that professes to be internationalist. He said "the core reason for building a global trade regime is to create a third-party institution that helps manage conflicts that could ultimately endanger international welfare, peace and security." Endi