Off the wire
China exports unit trains to Argentina  • Roundup: Direct talks between Afghan gov't, Taliban welcomed  • Philippines to pan out method to detect rice viruses  • Oppositions submit bills to counter Abe's contentious war legislation package  • S. African experts say BRICS bank to correct financing problems for members  • Greece pledges reforms as of next week requesting ESM aid to avert Grexit  • Working conditions in Cambodia's garment factories slightly improved: group  • New Horizons returns to normal science operation, ready for historic Pluto flyby  • Chinese publications fourth most-cited globally  • 1st LD: 20 killed in road accident near Pakistani capital  
You are here:   Home

Myanmar's parliament agrees on increased power sharing in constitution amendment

Xinhua, July 8, 2015 Adjust font size:

Myanmar's parliament on Wednesday voted in favor of some sub-sections of the constitution amendment bill under Section 436 (b) dealing with power sharing between the central government and region or state governments, agreeing to increase power to the region or state level administration.

The secret voting came several days after debate as a follow-up done on other sections of the amendment on June 25.

The sub-sections deal with power sharing of executive, taxation and resources.

One particular section proposing to amend for appointing chief minister of regions or states by the parliament failed to win 75- percent vote to get approved, retaining that the region or state chief ministers are to be assigned by the president without change under the existing constitution.

Amendment bills for all other sections were not passed.

On June 25, Myanmar's parliament vetoed almost all six sections of amendment bills but one for the 2008 constitution. The only one section, which was voted in its favor, is Section 59(d) dealing with the qualification of a presidential candidate.

Other amendment bills, submitted by the ruling Union Solidarity and Development Party (USDP), for the remaining five Sections, 59 (f), 436(a), 436 (b), 60 (c) and 418 (b) were turned down as the number of voters stood less than 75 percent, the percentage required to pass the bill. Endi