Off the wire
Weather forecast for major Chinese cities, regions -- Jan. 8  • News Analysis: Israelis, Palestinians, far from negotiating table than ever before?  • Up to 3 bln trips expected during China's Spring Festival travel rush  • Shanghai FTZ woos foreign tech talent  • Roundup: Bangladesh records lowest temperature in 5 decades, 12 cold-related deaths reported  • Int'l security conference kicks off in Iran's Tehran  • DiDi completes 7.43 bln rides in 2017  • GAC builds passenger car plant in central China  • Chinese express firms deliver over 40 bln parcels in 2017  • Uganda denies any deal with Israel to host thousands of African migrants  
You are here:  

Palestinians accuse Israel of undermining international law by implying death sentences

Xinhua,January 08, 2018 Adjust font size:

RAMALLAH, Jan. 8 (Xinhua) -- Palestinian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Expatriates said Monday the Israel undermines international law by implying its use of death penalty against Palestinians who have been "indicted of carrying out, or trying to carry out operations."

The ministry said in an emailed press statement that this means that the death penalty is already used in Israel even before the law is passed, accusing Israel of undermining international law.

The statement went on saying that this new revelation "proofs that the Israeli government and various arms are involved in crimes against Palestinians that may be described as war crimes and crimes against humanity, necessitating a moral awakening and international protection of the unarmed Palestinian citizens from the oppressions of the occupation."

Last Wednesday, the Israeli Knesset passed by preliminary first reading a bill that allows death sentences to Palestinians. Spearheaded by the Israel Beiteinu leader Avigdor Libermann, the reading passed with a narrow win of 52 members of the Knesset versus 49 votes against.

If passed in second and third readings, military courts would have the authority to change a current law to issue death sentences by a simple majority among the judges panel, instead of requiring a unanimous vote. Enditem