Off the wire
President Xi urges new media outlet to "tell China stories well"  • Top news items in major S. African media outlets  • 1st LD-Writethru: President Xi calls for more effort on free trade zones  • More than 1 million Filipino drug users surrender to police: official  • Yearender: Rise in far-right forces requires EU response to populism  • Deposits in Cypriot banks rise by 6.8 pct in November  • 4 mln foreign tourists visit Cuba in 2016  • China to release environmental forecasts on three Nansha reefs from Jan. 1  • Greek ambassador's wife arrested for ordering murder: Brazilian police  • China-Serbia visa-free regime to go into effect  
You are here:   Home

Disney wins copyright infringement case against Chinese companies

Xinhua, December 31, 2016 Adjust font size:

Two Chinese companies must pay compensation to Disney Enterprises, Inc. and Pixar for intellectual property right infringement and unfair competition, according to a recent Shanghai court verdict.

Disney Enterprises, Inc. and Pixar, holders of the copyrights of animated comedies "Cars" and "Cars 2" as well as the character images, sued G-Point in Beijing, and Bluemtv in Xiamen in eastern China's Fujian Province, after they found the images, title and posters of animated movie "The Autobots" resembled those of "Cars" and "Cars 2."

"The Autobots" screened last July was produced by Bluemtv and released by G-Point.

The case was heard in Shanghai Pudong New District People's Court in June.

The court ruled an immediate stop to the infringement act and ordered compensation of over 1.35 million yuan (194,440 U.S. dollars).

Bluemtv was asked to pay 1 million yuan to cover the plantiffs' economic losses, of which G-Point has joint liability for 800,000 yuan. The two companies were also asked to pay 350,000 yuan to cover the legal expenses of the plaintiffs.

The court said the images of the main characters in "The Autobots" -- "K1" and "K2" -- infringed on the copyright of the characters "Lightening McQueen" and "Francesco Bernoulli" in "Cars" and "Cars 2."

The court said the Chinese title of the movie has a different meaning to the Disney productions and should not be seen as unfair competition, but the resemblance in the visual effect of the movie's name on the poster constitutes an act of unfair competition, although the overall design of the posters is different. Endi