Off the wire
World War II veterans honored in front of memorial monument  • Next U.S. president likely to face lawmaker scrutiny: report  • Interview: APEC summit to boost business opportunities for Peru  • Chinese premier says "16+1" cooperation benefits world peace, development  • Profile: Nicaraguan First Lady Rosario Murillo running for VP  • Roundup: Italian gov't takes emergency measures for quake-hit regions  • Study calls for independent monitoring of carbon offset programs  • Turkish president praises frequent high-level contacts with China  • Roundup: Domestic turbulence in Turkey strains ties with West  • Morocco climate conference to design ways to implement Paris Agreement  
You are here:   Home

Review probes downtime thought patterns, neural network interactions

Xinhua, November 6, 2016 Adjust font size:

A review of brain imaging studies offers a new way of looking at spontaneous versus controlled thinking, challenging the adage that a wandering mind is an unhappy mind.

"Mind-wandering" and its variations are what psychology has traditionally described about all thought patterns when people have during downtime -- some daydream while others might focus on a to-do list, or get stuck in a negative loop.

In reviewing nearly 200 neuroscience studies, a large number of which used functional magnetic resonance imaging (FMRI) to scan brains during resting activities, researchers at the University of California, Berkeley, in the United States and the University of British Columbia in Canada looked at three different ways in which people think when they're not directly engaged in tasks: spontaneous thought, ruminative thought and goal-directed thought.

The researchers found that interactions between large-scale neural networks offered insights into how the resting mind moves.

For example, when the brain was focused on a task at hand, its prefrontal "executive" network, which governs planning and impulse control, among other functions, constrains other brain activity. When stuck in a negative loop, such as anxious rumination, the brain's "salience" network, which processes emotions, took control, shutting off most other networks. Spontaneous thought, such as daydreaming, dreaming during sleep and other forms of free association, were linked to far lower activity in the neural networks responsible for controlled thinking, allowing the imagination to flow freely.

Overall, the researchers hypothesize that the resting mind naturally transitions between spontaneous and constrained thought.

"Let's say you're walking to the grocery store," said review co-author Zachary Irving, a postdoctoral scholar at UC Berkeley. "At first, your mind wanders to a plethora of ideas: your new shirt, a joke you heard today, an upcoming ski trip to Lake Tahoe (in northern California). Then your thoughts become automatically constrained when you start to worry about a looming work deadline that needs to be met before the Tahoe trip. Then you realize that your worries are making you miserable, so you deliberately constrain your thoughts, forcing your mind back to grocery shopping."

The qualitative review, published in the November issue of Nature Reviews Neuroscience, suggests that increased awareness of how our thoughts move when our brains are at rest could lead to better diagnoses and targeted treatments for such mental conditions as depression, anxiety and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

"It's important to know not only the difference between free-ranging mind-wandering and sticky, obsessive thoughts, but also to understand, within this framework, how these types of thinking work together," said Irving. Historically, the field of psychology has approached mental disorders separately, as though each were in a vacuum rather than being interconnected.

"Clinicians have studied compulsive rumination in isolation, and ADHD in isolation," he said. "But now there's a huge interest in how we can make sure that the psychology and neuroscience literature is more closely aligned to what is happening in our heads."

"We propose that mind-wandering isn't an odd quirk of the mind," the review's lead author Kalina Christoff, a psychology professor at the University of British Columbia, was quoted as saying in a news release from UC Berkeley. "Rather, it's something that the mind does when it enters into a spontaneous mode. Without this spontaneous mode, we couldn't do things like dream or think creatively."

There are upsides to ADHD, noted Irving, who has the most stigmatized mental disorders. "Everyone's mind has a natural ebb and flow of thought, but our framework reconceptualizes disorders like ADHD, depression and anxiety as extensions of that normal variation in thinking. This framework suggests, in a sense, that we all have someone with anxiety and ADHD in our minds. The anxious mind helps us focus on what's personally important; the ADHD mind allows us to think freely and creatively." Endit