Off the wire
China prepares for Typhoon Megi  • 3 paramilitary troopers wounded in grenade attack in Indian-controlled Kashmir  • Interview: London mayor Sadiq Khan wants more Londoners of Chinese origin to take part in mainstream politics  • Peace efforts in S. Sudan need Machar to proceed: rebel spokesman  • Azerbaijan holds referendum on constitutional amendments  • U.S. stocks open lower following global rout  • EU defense ministers to talk about EU-NATO cooperation in Bratislava  • Sampaoli and Sevilla look for solutions ahead of Champions League clash  • Rwanda seeks more investments in manufacturing sector  • 1st LD: Yemeni forces kill major al-Qaida leader  
You are here:   Home

1st LD-Writethru: China court sentences trio for disturbing social order

Xinhua, September 26, 2016 Adjust font size:

A trio who organized strikes were found guilty of disrupting the peace Monday and handed suspended sentences ranging from 18 months to three years by a court in Guangzhou, capital of south China's Guangdong Province.

Zeng Feiyang was handed a four-year suspended sentence, of which he will have to serve three years should he fall afoul of the law in the four year period. Tang Huanxing and Zhu Xiaomei were each given 18-month sentences suspended for two years. They had all previously worked at a support center for migrant workers, which was founded by Zeng and has since been closed by the industry and commerce authority.

"The defendants ignored national laws and organized mass gatherings that disturbed social order. Their acts, of a severe nature, resulted in an enterprise being suspended and led to grave losses," said a statement by the people's court of Panyu District.

According to the court, Zeng led the center and its work and managed those below him. Tang was responsible for online publicity for the center, and Zhu was in charge of managing migrant workers.

All three pled guilty and chose not to appeal.

In his statement given during the trial, Zeng admitted that he had received funding and training from "some overseas organizations hostile to China, and organized workers to resort to extreme means to safeguard their interests and blow things out of proportion to hype up the consequences."

According to the court, the three confessed to their crimes after they had been arrested, and all were first offenders and repented, facts that influenced the lighter penalties.

In his final statement, Zeng bowed to the court and expressed his "deep regret."

"I accepted training and funding from overseas organizations hostile to China, and, at their request, incited and organized workers to protect their rights in an extreme way," Zeng said.

He said his actions had intended to "blow up the events and create influence."

He said that he had received large amounts of money from overseas organizations and had been touted "the star of labor movement."

"My selfish desires were excessive and I did not repent even after the 'center' was closed," he said.

Zeng admitted that his behavior had caused huge damage to the enterprise, were against the law and he had been used as a tool by overseas organizations to cause disorder in China.

He apologized for the losses caused by his crimes.

"I hope that others will take my case as a lesson and not be conned by such organizations," Zeng said, calling on workers to protect their rights through legal means and channels.

In Tang's final statement at court, he thanked the police and judicial staff.

"I was encouraged by Zeng to join the 'center' and took part in organizing the events under Zeng's instructions," Tang said.

Tang said he was tasked with publicizing the agenda to incite workers not to accept the terms from the enterprise.

"I will keep a sober mind in the future and will not be fooled again," he said.

Zhu said in her statement that she was an ordinary worker at the enterprise and met Zeng during a rights protection event before joining the "center." She was sent to receive training overseas and had accepted their practices and participated in organizing activities.

She said that she came to realize the seriousness of her crimes and called on her fellow workers to protect their rights and interests in accordance with the law.

According to the court statement, during the trial, the two sides fully expressed their views on the facts and sentences of the defendants' crimes. Endi