Off the wire
Spotlight: Promotion of inter-connectivity for new Asia-Europe cooperation  • 103 senior military officers detained in Turkey's coup attempt probe  • China vows investment, financing reform  • China to send 416 athletes to Rio Olympics  • Kenya to send 24 athletes to Rio Paralympic Games  • Spotlight: China-ASEAN ties not to be affected by South China Sea issue  • Spotlight: Uncertainties remain in Turkey after foiled coup attempt  • Foreign exchange rates in India  • Vietnam to host 10th Asia-Pacific Cooperative Ministers' Conference  • News Analysis: Opposition to THAAD deployment in S.Korea gets stronger among villagers  
You are here:   Home

South China Sea arbitral tribunal loses its own face by lack of political wisdom: Indian expert

Xinhua, July 18, 2016 Adjust font size:

The ad-hoc arbitral tribunal lost its own face in the South China Sea arbitration with the lack of political wisdom, and countries would return to negotiations to solve disputes, an Indian expert said here Monday.

Swaran Singh, professor at School of International Studies of Jawaharlal Nehru University in India, said the arbitration unilateral initiated by the Philippines is not a victory even for the Philippines itself, as the newly inaugurated president Rodrigo Duterte had shown little trust in the arbitration.

"If the Philippines doesn't believe it, it will have a very limited role to play," he said.

The Chinese government said the ad hoc arbitral tribunal has no jurisdiction over relevant submissions, and awards rendered by it are null and void and have no binding force.

Speaking to reporters during a think tank seminar on South China Sea and regional cooperation and development, Singh said the arbitral tribunal lacked political wisdom by not seeking a resolution on the ground.

"The fundamental principle of arbitration is that both parties should submit the case for arbitration, should participate in the arbitration, should give undertakings that the binding outcome will be acceptable to them, which are missing in this case," he said.

"So I think the casualty here is arbitration itself. The trust of people in international relations in arbitration being a solution has been really hit badly by this." Enditem