Off the wire
• 1st LD-Writethru: China's fixed-asset investment continues to slow  • 1st LD-Writethru: China's property investment slows, inventory drops  • Pakistan condemns truck attack in France  • Urgent: China H1 economic growth in line with expectations: premier  • S.Korea posts 11.5 bln USD trade surplus in June  • 1st LD: Cambodia supports settlement of South China Sea disputes via dialogue, consultation: PM  • Euro deposits in S.Korea fall on Brexit effect  • Backgrounder: International Court of Justice totally distinct from Permanent Court of Arbitration  • Singapore strongly condemns heinous attack in Nice, France  • China's fiscal revenue rises 1.7 pct in June  
You are here: 　 Home

U.S. urged to reimburse Philippines over South China Sea arbitration case

Xinhua, July 15, 2016 Adjust font size:

The United States should reimburse the Philippines for the legal fees and expenses in filing the South China Sea arbitration case against China, a Philippine columnist said Friday.

Rigoberto Tiglao, a columnist who writes regularly for local English daily newspaper The Manila Times, said the U.S. has been tearing its hair out trying to get an excuse to intervene in the South China Sea issue.

"They (the U.S.) don't have claims in the area, and they even haven't ratified the UNCLOS (United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea)," he added.

The case unilaterally initiated by the former Philippine government now gave the U.S. what it wanted, so it should reimburse the Philippines, he said.

Tiglao noted that he was informed that the country spent 30 million U.S. dollars "for the legal fees and expenses of the eight top-notch international lawyers and their staff who prepared our case against China."

"They (the lawyers) managed to get the PCA (the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague) to redefine the standard meaning of 'arbitration,' which for centuries had been defined as procedure in which two parties agree to a third party to settle their dispute. Now, it seems, 'arbitration' can be a unilateral arbitration," he said.

The tribunal handling the case issued its final award on Tuesday, amid a global chorus that the panel has no jurisdiction and its decision is naturally null and void.

The award sweepingly sided with the claims unilaterally filed by the administration of former Philippine President Benigno S. Aquino III, which in the eyes of many observers, is a mockery of justice.

China has refused to participate in the proceedings, reiterating that the tribunal has no jurisdiction over the case, which is in essence related to territorial sovereignty and maritime delimitation.

China has also said it will continue to endeavor to peacefully resolve disputes in the South China Sea with parties directly concerned through negotiation and consultation on the basis of respecting historical facts and in accordance with international law. Endit