Off the wire
• Difficult to predict Argentina vs United States result  • Eastbourne WTA results  • Stanford researchers find new way of making hydrogen fuel from water  • Spotlight: Four gun-control measures blocked by U.S. Senate after Orlando shooting  • U.S. Justice Department releases full transcript of Orlando gunman's 911 call under criticism  • Two fires sweep over Angeles National Forest in LA, forcing evacuation  • Venezuelan gov't deploys multidisciplinary team to disorderly state  • China calls for integrated solution to enhance WMD non-proliferation: envoy  • Xi urges China, Poland to set up paradigm of Belt and Road cooperation  • News Analysis: Great leap for Chinese-made supercomputers, but challenges remain  
You are here: 　 Home

Australia's consumer watchdog to take multinational food company Heinz to court

Xinhua, June 21, 2016 Adjust font size:

Australia's consumer watchdog on Tuesday announced it is taking the H.J. Heinz Company Australia to federal court, alleging the food giant is guilty of misleading and deceptive conduct under Australian consumer law.

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) released a statement detailing the case against Heinz, which, worldwide, employs more than 32,000 employees.

The ACCC alleges the company's Little Kids Shredz products feature images and statements that misrepresent the nutritional value of the food aimed at children aged between one and three years.

"The Shredz products' packaging features prominent images of fresh fruit and vegetables and statements such as '99 percent fruit and veg' and 'Our range of snacks and meals encourages your toddler to independently discover the delicious taste of nutritious food'," the statement said.

"The ACCC alleges that these images and statements represent to consumers that the products are of equivalent nutritional value to fruit and vegetables and are a healthy and nutritious food for children aged one to three years, when this is not the case."

ACCC chairman Rod Sims said the case would be taken to court in order to set a precedent that misleading young parents, and children who cannot choose their own nutritious food, is unethical.

"The ACCC has brought these proceedings because it alleges that Heinz is marketing these products as healthy options for young children when they are not," Sims said on Tuesday.

"These products contain over 60 percent sugar, which is significantly higher than that of natural fruit and vegetables -- for example, an apple contains approximately 10 percent sugar.

"We also allege that rather than encouraging children to develop a taste for nutritious food, these Heinz Shredz products are likely to inhibit the development of a child's taste for natural fruit and vegetables and encourage a child to become accustomed to, and develop a preference for, sweet tastes."

"The ACCC wants to make clear that major companies have an obligation under the Australian Consumer Law to ensure products' health claims do not mislead the public."

The ACCC has said it is seeking for the products to be described accurately, as well as a monetary fine, corrective notices and costs of the legal proceedings. Endit