Off the wire
(Recast) Man finds 2000-year-old butter in Irish bog  • 1st LD: Syria TV says rebels fired nerve agent on soldiers near Damascus  • Government agencies, SOEs required to hear more from legal counsels  • Starting lineup of England for Euro 2016 Group B match against Wales  • Starting lineup of Wales for Euro 2016 Group B match against England  • China's supreme court rules against Eli Lilly in patent infringement case  • Roundup: Bangladesh eyes AIIB funds for power project to benefit 12.5 mln people  • Feature: CAEXPO exhibition in Vietnam helps boost China-Vietnam business cooperation, exchanges  • China Focus: 2-tonne ice case prompts China to tighten drug bust at sea  • China preparing for new era of space economy  
You are here:   Home

News Analysis: European "referendum fever" may harm democracy

Xinhua, June 16, 2016 Adjust font size:

Europe seems to be experiencing a "referendum fever," starting with the "Brexit" on June 23, followed by the constitutional amendment referendum in Italy and refugee quota referendum in Hungary.

On the surface, referenda are the most formidable tool of democracy, giving voters a direct say on political, economic and social issues. However, behind the "referendum frenzy" in Europe, there are evolutions that may harm democracy.

MISAPPLICATION OF REFERENDUM

Looking back on the referenda held in European countries in the past few years, it is easy to find that the democratic tool has been frequently misapplied.

First of all, referenda, created to compensate and remedy the representative democracy, have been applied as a political tool to exert or fend off pressure.

Taking Greece's referendum during its debt crisis as an example, Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras aimed to grasp more negotiation room from the Europe Union and international creditors by extortion with Greek public will.

Second, referenda have become a channel for people to air grievances, rather than being decisive in major issues.

The Dutch referendum, which was originally on the Association Agreement between the European Union and Ukraine, turned into a protest vote against the EU by euroskeptics.

Third, referenda on occasions cover the essence of problems and postpone the outbreak of crises, making situation more complicated.

BREAKING PROMISE, SHIRKING RESPONSIBILITY

Frequent referenda show increased disappointment of the public at political elite, said Cui Hongjian, a senior research fellow on European studies at the China Institute of International Studies.

Referenda, supposed to get citizens engaged in politics and make governments responsive, are also a double-edged sword, Cui said, as they seem to attract the broadest public will thus bring about authority and legitimacy, but in fact they are reflection of shirking responsibility by some politicians.

Critics argue that voters are forced to make decisions on complex issues about which they may not have complete knowledge. Referenda tend to create the illusion that complex issues can be presented in simple terms, and the vote is often reduced to a binary "yes" or "no."

FROZEN, REVERSED EU INTEGRATION

Given the current situation in Europe, the spate of referenda may continue and cause political and social impact.

First of all, inspired by Brexit, many European countries are expected to hold referenda to gain political ground domestically and force the EU to compromise.

Second, referendum makes "reaching consensus" increasingly hard, even exacerbates contradiction and creates breeding ground for populism.

Stefan Lehne, a visiting scholar at Carnegie Europe in Brussels, said "it's almost impossible now to see how 28 states would ratify an EU reform treaty."

In the Brexit case, British Prime Minister David Cameron said the upcoming referendum can solve Britain's "EU problem." However, the referendum in fact strengthens opposition and exacerbates social division. Endi