Off the wire
China creates more development zones to foster innovation  • S. African gov't to discuss terror alert with U.S.: presidency  • GMOs continue to divide EU institutions  • Portuguese president vetoes surrogacy bill  • Bulgarian president pleads for his country's adhesion to Schengen Zone  • Former Nigerian football coach Keshi dies at 54  • China-Myanmar Paukphaw friendship foundation set up in Yangon  • LME base metals increase on Wednesday  • China mulls regulating facilities for mentally ill offenders  • Zambia says no license for fourth mobile phone operator  
You are here:   Home

S. African presidency mulling matters concerning expropriation bill

Xinhua, June 9, 2016 Adjust font size:

The Presidency said on Wednesday that it is considering matters relating to the Expropriation Bill amid an outcry over the legislation.

"The Presidency has received the Expropriation Bill of 2015 from the National Assembly for assent and signing into law," spokesperson Bongani Ngqulunga said.

"The Presidency has also received objections to the bill. All matters are still being processed," said Ngqulunga.

This came after the opposition Democratic Alliance (DA) on Tuesday petitioned President Jacob Zuma to refer the "job-killing" Expropriation Bill back to Parliament.

The party insists that the bill is unconstitutional and has procedural irregularities which characterized its passing.

This needs to be rectified by Parliament and the president cannot in good conscience assent to it, until it has been brought in line with the Constitution, said the DA.

Parliament in May approved the bill that would allow the government to make compulsory purchases of land to speed up redressing racial disparities.

South Africa's ruling African National Congress (ANC), facing local elections in August, has promised to speed up plans to redistribute land which remains predominantly in white hands two decades after the end of apartheid.

The bill, which sets out the legislative requirements for the state to lay claim to land for public purpose or in the pubic interest, was passed after ruling ANC and some MPs of opposition parties voted in favour of the bill, which was slightly amended by the National Council of Provinces (NCOP).

The DA maintains that the chief concern with this bill is that it, in its current incarnation, violates the Constitution with specific reference to the right to property and the right not to be evicted without an order of the court as distilled the Constitution.

Additionally, the bill was met with fatal procedural errors because it was not passed in a manner consistent with the Constitution and the bill should be referred back to the NCOP to fix these errors, it said.

Some economists and farming groups have said the bill could hit investment and production at a time when South Africa is emerging from a major drought.

But the government says the redistribution process needs to be accelerated, to rectify past wrongs and provide opportunities to the previously excluded. It has also said it will stick to the law and not follow the example of Zimbabwe, where farm seizures have destroyed the economy.

After taking power in 1994, the ANC promised to transfer 30 percent of the farmland to blacks, but only a third of the target has been achieved.

Experts estimate that about eight million hectares of farmland have been transferred to black owners since the end of apartheid. Enditem