Off the wire
• Roundup: 12.6 million people die each year due to unhealthy environments: UN agency  • Cuba, U.S. to restore direct mail links  • Aussie dollar follows commodities lower  • Over 225 million women who want family planning can't get it: UNFPA  • Roundup: Hamas refutes reports saying talks with Egypt have failed     • Roundup: Canadian stocks fall as miners weigh, healthcare tanks  • UN chief urges Israel to reverse land seizure in West Bank  • Interview: Mankind could attempt landing on Mars in late 2030s: Italian scientist  • Washington subway to shut down for 29 hours for inspection  • Czech U-21 football team nominates roster for European championship qualifiers  
You are here: 　 Home

Apple submits final argument before court hearing on terrorist's phone

Xinhua, March 16, 2016 Adjust font size:

Apple Inc. picked up U.S. history on Tuesday to fend off the attempt by the Department of Justice (DOJ) to seek help in trying to hack into the phone of a terrorist killer.

Alleging that the DOJ is trying to "rewrite history" by requesting a specialized software for the purpose of bypassing a security feature of an iPhone 5c, the Silicon Valley technology company said America's founding fathers "would be appalled."

The smartphone was used by Syed Farook, who together with his wife Tashfeen Malik shot dead 14 people on Dec. 2 last year in San Bernardino, California, before being killed by police. It has a feature that erases data after 10 unsuccessful unlocking attempts.

Apple's latest argument, submitted to Judge Sheri Pym, of the U.S. District Court, Central California, was in response to the DOJ's court filing on March 10, in which the department alleged that Apple "deliberately raised technological barriers" to block the access to the phone.

It was Apple's final filing before the two sides are scheduled to appear at a court hearing on March 22 before Judge Pym, who ordered on Feb. 16 that the company help the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) hack into the device.

A day before the filing, Apple counsel Ted Boutrous told TV channel CNBC that the company regards the dispute as "a policy issue" and does not believe the right forum for its battle with the government is the courts.

However, in an earlier TV interview, Apple Chief Executive Officer Tim Cook suggested that he would fight all the way up the U.S. Supreme Court. Endit