Off the wire
India has highest number of under-5 child deaths globally: study  • News Analysis: Fiscal stimulus to assume bigger growth-supportive role  • Urgent: Casualties feared as blast rocks district in N. Afghanistan  • Virgin Australia boss opens new terminal facilities in Brisbane  • Commentary: European refugee crisis bitter fruit of Western hegemony, interventionism  • Survey shows more belly fat kids in Vietnam's HCM City  • Australia not prepared for Chinese tourist boom  • China to reform quarterly GDP accounting system  • PNG to demand Aussie PM extradite accused rapists  • Xinhua Asia-Paficic news summary at 0630 GMT, Sept. 9  
You are here:   Home

Commentary: Western style of dealing with refugee crisis hypocritical

Xinhua, September 9, 2015 Adjust font size:

While the West is slow to act to cope with a refugee crisis that appears to have taken them by surprise, developing countries have stood up to actively respond to the sizzling global issue.

Brazil, Venezuela and Chile are among the South American nations that have officially announced that they are ready to take in more of the mainly Syrian refugees fleeing their homeland, which has been torn by years of conflicts between government troops and West-supported opposition forces.

Blatant intervention in Syria's domestic affairs by the United States and some of its European allies, which have been pushing for a change of regime in Syria and militarily supporting the opposition factions, has contributed to the exodus of refugees.

Prior to Syria, the U.S.-led wars in Iraq and Afghanistan drove millions from their homes and into neighboring countries.

However, the way of these Western countries have tackled the refugee crisis of its own making is disappointing and irresponsible as they have adopted a wait-and-see attitude and retarded to respond.

U.S. President Barack Obama said Tuesday he was still "actively considering" how to respond to the crisis. British Prime Minister David Cameron said Monday his government would take in 20,000 refugees by 2020, the same number as Venezuela has pledged to host.

"The major refugee-hosting countries in the world are all in the Middle East, Africa and Asia," the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) said in its 2014 mid-year report, listing the top 10 refugee-hosting countries as Pakistan, Lebanon, Iran, Turkey, Jordan, Ethiopia, Kenya, Chad, Uganda and China (home to 300,000 Vietnamese).

In other words, the world's developing countries are shouldering the burden of the wealthier nations' irresponsible military interference and its devastating consequences.

As recently as June, UN High Commissioner for Refugees Antonio Guterres warned: "We are witnessing a paradigm change, an unchecked slide into an era in which the scale of global forced displacement as well as the response required is now clearly dwarfing anything seen before."

The UNHCR also spelled out the factors driving the crisis: "Since early 2011, the main reason for the acceleration has been the war in Syria, now the world's single-largest driver of displacement. Last year, a daily average of 42,500 people became refugees, asylum seekers, or internally displaced, a four-fold increase in just four years."

Today's refugee crisis gives the lie to the argument Washington often uses to justify many of its "military exploits" on foreign soil: that death and destruction are necessary evils toward the greater goal of democracy-building, as there can be no democracy at all where there is only ruin and despair. Endi