Off the wire
China treasury bond futures open higher Wednesday  • Austria's largest refugee camp freezes intake  • Overreaction to Australia's Stolen Generations hindering child protection: judge  • China Hushen 300 index futures open higher Wednesday  • Market exchange rates in China -- Aug. 5  • Chinese shares open lower on Wednesday  • LatAm needs to adopt "digital single market" to counter technological lag: UN agency  • Chinese yuan weakens to 6.1186 against USD Wednesday  • Indian-controlled Australian coal mine hits legal hurdle  • Investigators should know at weekend if debris belongs to missing flight: Australian deputy PM  
You are here:   Home

Ecuadorian victims reject U.S. court verdict in favor of Chevron

Xinhua, August 5, 2015 Adjust font size:

Victims of the environmental contamination caused by U.S. oil company Chevron in Ecuador's Amazon on Tuesday rejected a U.S. ruling that Ecuador must pay a big sum to Chevron in damages.

The District of Columbia Court of Appeals ruled on Tuesday that Ecuador must pay 96 million U.S. dollars to the multinational which is involved in a lengthy dispute over the exploitation of oil resources in the country.

The court upheld a decision made in 2011 by a tribunal in The Hague, the Netherlands, after Chevron demanded reparations from Ecuador for violating the bilateral investment treaty it had signed with the United States in 1997.

Pablo Fajardo, the lawyer representing the affected Ecuadorians, wrote on Twitter that it would it be "unjust for the government to pay Chevron after it committed an environmental crime against humanity" in the Amazon.

Chevron was originally sentenced by an Ecuadorian court to pay 9.5 billion U.S. dollars to 30,000 people in indemnities for environmental damage and health problems incurred by its operations.

The contamination was caused by Texaco, a firm acquired by Chevron in 2001, which operated 350 oil wells in the country between 1964 and 1992.

The American oil company rejected the verdict of the Ecuadorian court, saying that it was the result of a "fraudulent and illegitimate" legal process. The allegation was backed up in 2014 by a U.S. court which found "egregious fraud" during the case, including bribery to a judge. Endi