The current poverty-relief mode of development has limitations in
helping the poor. Adjustments should be made according to local
conditions, says an article in the Beijing-based Study
Times. An except follows:
The number of indigent Chinese with an annual net income of less
than 637 yuan (US$77) increased by 800,000 people in 2003.
This is the first time that the number has increased since China
adopted its reform and opening-up policies in the late 1970s.
And this happened in the same year that China's average gross
domestic product per capita exceeded US$1,000 and its fiscal
revenue reached 2 trillion yuan (US$241 billion).
It
shows poverty-relief work is being disregarded.
Assisting about 30 million indigent people, although not a big
portion compared with the total population, is the hardest part of
the poverty-relief equation.
People in this group are either disabled and cannot work or living
in extremely harsh conditions. For them, the current efforts are
not very effective.
Development investment focuses on production and infrastructure
construction but ignores the quality of human resources, such as
education and public health.
Additionally, the yield of industrial projects in poverty-stricken
areas is usually poor. Also, poverty-relief funds do not always
reach their target recipients.
More harmful is the damage done to the environment.
Most of the poverty-stricken population live in underdeveloped
frontier areas, especially in the western regions. The environment
there has long been coming off second best.
The development of agricultural production does improve the income
levels of local residents, yet it further deteriorates the
ecological environment.
Once the environment cannot regenerate itself, the rate of
deterioration increases - and the results of poverty-relief work
evaporate. Thus, in some areas, the number of people returning to
poverty outnumbers those who have managed to shuck it off.
Any kind of poverty-relief approach has benefits, as well as
limitations. It means adjustments need to be made according to
local conditions.
Relief should focus on reaching its target recipients, and
enhancing investment in rural education, technical training and
public health. For those living in areas with few resources,
migration should be the way out.
(China Daily July 28, 2004)
|