The poisoning incident could go to litigation if demands for
compensation are not met. Two lawyers have now arrived in the
northeastern Chinese city to collect evidence for a possible law
case. Both are members of a Sino-Japanese Lawyers' group that has
prosecuted similar cases in the past.
The poisonings began to come to light a week ago. Since then, the
Japanese government has acknowledged that the mustard gas was left
behind by Japanese troops after World War II. But it has not given
any word on compensation. Some of the victims' families are now
thinking of litigation.
"What I want now is treatment for my son. If he doesn't recover or
we can't get any compensation, we'll think about suing the Japanese
government," said Victim's family member.
Su
Xiangxiang and Luo Lijuan are the first lawyers to offer legal
representation to the victims and the local government. They are
members of a Sino-Japanese lawyers group that came together a
decade ago to defend victims of biochemical weapons abandoned by
Japanese troops in China.
The Qiqihar incident is one of the worst on record. To date, 37
people have been hospitalized after exposure to the chemicals. And
two are in critical condition.
"Our job is to sort through the evidence to prepare for possible
litigation. This case has aroused a lot of interest around the
world, including in Japan. As lawyers, we are obliged to find out
what really happens here and defend the rights of victims," said
Luo Lijuan.
This is not the first such case for the two lawyers. Su Xiangxiang
has spent the last eight years championing the rights of victims in
similar incidents. But the outcome has not been encouraging.
Chemical weapons left by the Japanese have been accused of
poisoning more than 2000 people in China. In the past decade, 7
lawsuits have been filed against the Japanese government. But, to
date, not a single cent has been paid to victims in compensation.
The latest case ended in May. The Japanese acknowledge the facts
put forward by the Chinese plaintiffs. But they dismissed the
victims' demand for compensation.
"Why do we plan to litigate, even when we know we might lose? It's
because we have two battle fronts in Japan. One is in the
courtroom. There we can force the Japanese government to face the
crimes of the past. The second is through civil organizations in
Japan. This way, the Japanese public learns more about what really
happened. Ultimately, we hope to see a political solution to the
problem. Litigation is one way of serving that end," said Su
Xiangxiang.
The two Chinese lawyers will be joined later in the week by their
Japanese colleagues. They believe their work can make a
difference.
"Luo Lijuan's mission is the latest in his eight year campaign to
win compensation for victims. He knows this won't be an easy case.
But he won't give up. He and his colleague believe their work will
be rewarded when legislation is introduced in Japan addressing the
problem.
(CCTV.com August 14, 2003)
|